INWORLD AITEXT-TO-SPEECH34,876 SAMPLES / 30 DAYSLAST RUN AUG 28, 2026, 21:30 UTC

official resource

TTS Flash 2 text-to-speech benchmarks

Inworld TTS 2 Flash is the latency-oriented member of Inworld's second-generation synthesis family.

TTFA Network Roundtrip#1 / 28
84ms
TTFA Leading Silence#7 / 28
45ms
Word Error Rate#15 / 30
4.9%

Overview

The endpoint retains multilingual, cloning and emotion-control capabilities while using its own API model name.

TTS Flash 2 is tested every day on a fixed set of text prompts, measuring how quickly audible speech starts and how intelligible the result is.

Technical specifications

Made by
Inworld AI
Hosted by
Inworld AI
Source
Official API
Licensing
Proprietary
Deployment
Cloud
Region
US
Features
Multilingual, Voice cloning, Emotion control

How TTS Flash 2 ranks

Full TTS dashboard
Time to First Audio — every measured TTS modelMilliseconds · lower is better · 30-day averageEvery TTS model ranked on Time to First Audio, with TTS Flash 2 highlighted.
  1. #2vui124 ms
  2. #3TTS Flash 2128 ms
  3. #4TTS 2176 ms
  4. #5Blizzard235 ms
  5. #6Neural236 ms
  6. #7Mist v3256 ms
  7. #8TTS Rt v2262 ms
  8. #9Sonic 3.5274 ms
  9. #10TTS RT v1275 ms
  10. #12Coda313 ms
Show all 30 models
  1. #13Aura 2328 ms
  2. #14S2.1 Pro374 ms
  3. #15Default384 ms
  4. #18Grok TTS420 ms
  5. #19S1434 ms
  6. #20Flash v2.5455 ms
  7. #21Speech 2.8 HD460 ms
  8. #22Sonic 3.6466 ms
  9. #23Simba 3.2484 ms
  10. #24Chirp 3 HD512 ms
  11. #25Simba 3.0526 ms
  12. #26Falcon 2549 ms
  13. #29S2.1 Pro Free806 ms
  14. #30GPT-4o mini TTS1075 ms
median of all models · 397 ms
TTS models over the last 30 days, ranked on Time to First Audio.
#ModelHostTTFAWERSamples
1Palabra TTS v1Palabra116 ms5.9%14,396
2vuiFluxions124 ms8,624
3TTS Flash 2Inworld AI128 ms8,719
4TTS 2Inworld AI176 ms4.8%14,529
5BlizzardLmnt235 ms7.4%14,117
6NeuralAzure236 ms4.3%3,350
7Mist v3Rime256 ms6.3%14,524
8TTS Rt v2Soniox262 ms8,849
9Sonic 3.5Cartesia274 ms6.1%14,513
10TTS RT v1Soniox275 ms3.7%14,528
11Dragon HD LatestAzure310 ms5.1%3,350
12CodaRime313 ms5.2%14,523
13Aura 2Deepgram328 ms5.3%14,501
14S2.1 ProFish Audio374 ms10,222
15DefaultGradium384 ms4.6%14,002
16Speech 2.8 TurboMiniMax411 ms4.8%1,997
17Eleven v3 ConversationalElevenLabs412 ms6,750
18Grok TTSxAI420 ms4.7%14,524
19S1Fish Audio434 ms4.9%10,236
20Flash v2.5ElevenLabs455 ms6.7%9,259
21Speech 2.8 HDMiniMax460 ms1,995
22Sonic 3.6Cartesia466 ms560
23Simba 3.2Speechify484 ms4.7%14,525
24Chirp 3 HDGoogle512 ms5.2%14,530
25Simba 3.0Speechify526 ms5.3%14,526
26Falcon 2Murf549 ms10,229
27Lightning v3.1 ProSmallest586 ms4.4%14,515
28Qwen3 TTS Flash RealtimeAlibaba645 ms8.8%14,530
29S2.1 Pro FreeFish Audio806 ms4.7%14,464
30GPT-4o mini TTSOpenAI1075 ms4.8%14,517
Under-sampled models are excluded; tied models share a place. Dotted WER values split into substitutions, deletions and insertions on hover or tap.

Latency vs accuracy

Where the errors come from

WER compositionTTS Flash 2's Word Error Rate split by error type · 30-day averageTTS Flash 2's WER split into substitutions, deletions and insertions.
  • TTS Flash 24.9%
SubstitutionsDeletionsInsertions

Averages and tail latency

Averages hide slow outliers — these are the distributions behind each figure.

TTS Flash 2 latency distributionMilliseconds · shared axis across metrics · last 30 daysTTS Flash 2's latency percentiles per metric: p25–p75 band, p50 tick, whisker to p99.
  • Time to First Audiop50 111 ms · p99 321 ms
  • TTFA Network Roundtripp50 61 ms · p99 260 ms
  • TTFA Leading Silencep50 44 ms · p99 119 ms
band p25–p75 · tick p50 · whisker to p99 with p90 and p95 stops
Average and percentile values per metric, with the number of samples behind each row.
MetricAveragep25p50p75p90p95p99Samples
Time to First Audio128 ms88 ms111 ms140 ms185 ms230 ms321 ms8,719
TTFA Network Roundtrip84 ms57 ms61 ms75 ms130 ms173 ms260 ms8,719
TTFA Leading Silence45 ms22 ms44 ms65 ms82 ms94 ms119 ms8,719
Word Error Rate4.9%0.0%0.0%9.5%18.8%20.0%35.7%8,719

Last 30 days

Daily medians from the same measurement runs · gaps are days without qualifying runs.

Time to First Audio — daily p50Line p50 · band p25–p75 · UTC daysTTS Flash 2's daily median Time to First Audio over the last 30 days.
TTS Flash 2 · Aug 10: 205 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 11: 200 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 12: 181 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 13: 161 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 14: 112 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 15: 114 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 16: 116 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 17: 121 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 18: 114 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 19: 120 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 20: 108 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 21: 117 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 22: 117 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 23: 118 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 24: 119 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 25: 66 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 26: 70 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 27: 72 msTTS Flash 2 · Aug 28: 74 ms
Word Error Rate — daily averageDaily average · UTC daysTTS Flash 2's daily Word Error Rate over the last 30 days.
TTS Flash 2 · Aug 10: 3.8%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 11: 5.3%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 12: 4.8%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 13: 3.9%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 14: 5.0%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 15: 4.3%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 16: 4.9%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 17: 4.5%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 18: 4.9%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 19: 5.2%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 20: 5.0%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 21: 4.3%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 22: 5.0%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 23: 5.2%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 24: 4.8%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 25: 5.6%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 26: 6.6%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 27: 4.7%TTS Flash 2 · Aug 28: 6.3%

Time to First Audio by dataset

TTS Flash 2 by test conditionMilliseconds · lower is better · best condition firstTTS Flash 2's Time to First Audio on each benchmark dataset.
Time to First Audio per dataset, with the number of samples behind each figure.
DatasetTTFASamples
Text prompts128 ms8,719

Strongest condition: Text prompts at 128 ms · weakest: Text prompts at 128 ms.

Limits of this comparison

The Flash variant receives the same prompts as standard TTS 2 for a direct latency and intelligibility comparison.

  • A speed-oriented label is not treated as a result; only Coval's current measurements determine relative latency.

Official sources

Results are re-measured daily using fixed datasets and reported over a rolling 30-day window. Same datasets, prompts and metric definitions for every model, measured by Coval’s open-source runner. Full methodology on the overview.

Evaluate your own voice agent

Use Coval to test your production configuration, prompts and calls—not only the public benchmark endpoints.

Book a Demo