Voice AI BenchmarksBy

RESON8SPEECH-TO-TEXT68,339 SAMPLES / 30 DAYSLAST RUN AUG 28, 2026, 21:30 UTC

official resource

resonant-1 speech-to-text benchmarks

Realtime is Reson8's streaming transcription endpoint.

Time to Final Segment#16 / 24
288ms
Word Error Rate#2 / 28
3.4%

Overview

The configured European service is multilingual and includes diarization plus keyterm controls.

resonant-1 is tested every day on fixed public audio — clean, accented, noisy, reverberant, far-field, clipped and phone-codec speech — for transcription accuracy and streaming latency.

Technical specifications

Made by
Reson8
Hosted by
Reson8
Source
Official API
Licensing
Proprietary
Deployment
Cloud
Region
Europe
Features
Multilingual, Diarization, Keyterm biasing

How resonant-1 ranks

Full STT dashboard
Time to Final Segment — every measured STT modelMilliseconds · lower is better · 30-day averageEvery STT model ranked on Time to Final Segment, with resonant-1 highlighted.
  1. #1STT RT v564 ms
  2. #2Parakeet TDT 0.6B v370 ms
  3. #3STT 183 ms
  4. #4Nova 399 ms
  5. #5Nova 2101 ms
  6. #6Ink 2108 ms
  7. #7Scribe v2 Realtime120 ms
  8. #8Universal 3.5 Pro146 ms
  9. #9Defaultvia Azure155 ms
  10. #10Whisper Large v3180 ms
  11. #11Velma 2 STT Streaming191 ms
  12. #12Grok STT199 ms
  13. #13Pulse205 ms
  14. #14Defaultvia Speechmatics223 ms
  15. #15Defaultvia Gradium249 ms
  16. #16resonant-1288 ms
Show all 24 models
  1. #17Enhanced341 ms
  2. #18Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime 2602356 ms
  3. #19GPT Realtime Whisper559 ms
  4. #20GPT-4o mini Transcribe623 ms
  5. #21Solaria 1680 ms
  6. #22GPT-4o Transcribe742 ms
  7. #23Chirp 2811 ms
  8. #24Chirp 3813 ms
median of all models · 202 ms
STT models over the last 30 days, ranked on Time to Final Segment.
#ModelHostTTFSWERTTFTSamples
1STT RT v5Soniox64 ms1533 ms29,322
2Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3Together AI70 ms1210 ms29,161
3STT 1Inworld AI83 ms1468 ms29,280
4Nova 3Deepgram99 ms1434 ms29,290
5Nova 2Deepgram101 ms1436 ms29,145
6Ink 2Cartesia108 ms1812 ms29,288
7Scribe v2 RealtimeElevenLabs120 ms2157 ms29,313
8Universal 3.5 ProAssemblyAI146 ms1030 ms29,280
9DefaultAzure155 ms1792 ms6,682
10Whisper Large v3Together AI180 ms1241 ms29,171
11Velma 2 STT StreamingModulate191 ms1576 ms17,895
12Grok STTxAI199 ms—29,322
13PulseSmallest205 ms2072 ms29,313
14DefaultSpeechmatics223 ms1473 ms29,323
15DefaultGradium249 ms1979 ms28,235
16resonant-1Reson8288 ms—17,066
17EnhancedSpeechmatics341 ms1536 ms29,322
18Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime 2602Mistral356 ms1828 ms29,175
19GPT Realtime WhisperOpenAI559 ms1823 ms29,286
20GPT-4o mini TranscribeOpenAI623 ms—29,318
21Solaria 1Gladia680 ms1703 ms26,356
22GPT-4o TranscribeOpenAI742 ms—29,318
23Chirp 2Google811 ms6000 ms29,237
24Chirp 3Google813 ms5999 ms29,319
—FluxDeepgram—1089 ms29,354
—Flux MultilingualDeepgram—1175 ms29,344
—Nemotron 3.5 ASR StreamingTogether AI—1540 ms29,193
—Universal StreamingAssemblyAI—1510 ms29,297
Under-sampled models are excluded; tied models share a place. Dotted WER values split into substitutions, deletions and insertions on hover or tap.

Highest relative placement: 2nd of 28 on Word Error Rate.

Latency vs accuracy

TTFS vs WEREach point is one measured model · resonant-1 highlighted · 30-day averagesTime to Final Segment against Word Error Rate for every measured STT model, with resonant-1 highlighted.
STT RT v5 — 64 ms, 5.8%Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 — 70 ms, 11.0%STT 1 — 83 ms, 4.8%Nova 3 — 99 ms, 6.3%Nova 2 — 101 ms, 7.9%Ink 2 — 108 ms, 4.9%Scribe v2 Realtime — 120 ms, 5.5%Universal 3.5 Pro — 146 ms, 3.2%Default via Azure — 155 ms, 5.3%Whisper Large v3 — 180 ms, 8.2%Velma 2 STT Streaming — 191 ms, 6.4%Grok STT — 199 ms, 4.8%Pulse — 205 ms, 5.3%Default via Speechmatics — 223 ms, 5.5%Default via Gradium — 249 ms, 10.0%Enhanced — 341 ms, 4.3%Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime 2602 — 356 ms, 6.2%GPT Realtime Whisper — 559 ms, 5.2%GPT-4o mini Transcribe — 623 ms, 5.1%Solaria 1 — 680 ms, 7.1%GPT-4o Transcribe — 742 ms, 4.7%Chirp 2 — 811 ms, 5.0%Chirp 3 — 813 ms, 4.1%resonant-1 — 288 ms, 3.4%

Where the errors come from

WER compositionresonant-1's Word Error Rate split by error type · 30-day averageresonant-1's WER split into substitutions, deletions and insertions.
  • resonant-13.4%
SubstitutionsDeletionsInsertions

Averages and tail latency

Averages hide slow outliers — these are the distributions behind each figure.

resonant-1 latency distributionMilliseconds · shared axis across metrics · last 30 daysresonant-1's latency percentiles per metric: p25–p75 band, p50 tick, whisker to p99.
  • Time to Final Segmentp50 273 ms · p99 473 ms
band p25–p75 · tick p50 · whisker to p99 with p90 and p95 stops
Average and percentile values per metric, with the number of samples behind each row.
MetricAveragep25p50p75p90p95p99Samples
Time to Final Segment288 ms255 ms273 ms291 ms383 ms405 ms473 ms17,066
Word Error Rate3.4%0.0%0.0%4.5%10.0%15.4%33.3%17,091

Last 30 days

Daily medians from the same measurement runs · gaps are days without qualifying runs.

Time to Final Segment — daily p50Line p50 · band p25–p75 · UTC daysresonant-1's daily median Time to Final Segment over the last 30 days.
resonant-1 · Aug 11: 259 msresonant-1 · Aug 12: 265 msresonant-1 · Aug 13: 261 msresonant-1 · Aug 14: 364 msresonant-1 · Aug 15: 348 msresonant-1 · Aug 16: 370 msresonant-1 · Aug 17: 271 msresonant-1 · Aug 18: 267 msresonant-1 · Aug 19: 267 msresonant-1 · Aug 20: 264 msresonant-1 · Aug 21: 263 msresonant-1 · Aug 22: 270 msresonant-1 · Aug 23: 259 msresonant-1 · Aug 24: 269 msresonant-1 · Aug 25: 274 msresonant-1 · Aug 26: 258 msresonant-1 · Aug 27: 270 msresonant-1 · Aug 28: 266 ms
Word Error Rate — daily averageDaily average · UTC daysresonant-1's daily Word Error Rate over the last 30 days.
resonant-1 · Aug 11: 4.1%resonant-1 · Aug 12: 4.0%resonant-1 · Aug 13: 3.6%resonant-1 · Aug 14: 4.6%resonant-1 · Aug 15: 3.3%resonant-1 · Aug 16: 4.5%resonant-1 · Aug 17: 4.3%resonant-1 · Aug 18: 4.3%resonant-1 · Aug 19: 4.5%resonant-1 · Aug 20: 4.6%resonant-1 · Aug 21: 3.4%resonant-1 · Aug 22: 4.7%resonant-1 · Aug 23: 4.1%resonant-1 · Aug 24: 3.7%resonant-1 · Aug 25: 3.8%resonant-1 · Aug 26: 3.6%resonant-1 · Aug 27: 4.2%resonant-1 · Aug 28: 4.1%

Time to Final Segment by dataset

resonant-1 by test conditionMilliseconds · lower is better · best condition firstresonant-1's Time to Final Segment on each benchmark dataset.
  1. WildASR accents262 ms
  2. WildASR clipping283 ms
  3. WildASR reverb283 ms
  4. WildASR phone codec285 ms
  5. WildASR clean286 ms
  6. WildASR far-field286 ms
  7. WildASR noise gaps288 ms
  8. PipeCat (production)293 ms
Time to Final Segment per dataset, with the number of samples behind each figure.
DatasetTTFSSamples
LibriSpeech303 ms1
ProductionPipeCat293 ms8,799
AccentsWildASR262 ms826
CleanWildASR286 ms3,332
ClippingWildASR283 ms831
Far-fieldWildASR286 ms830
Noise gapsWildASR288 ms829
Phone codecWildASR285 ms829
ReverbWildASR283 ms789

Strongest condition: WildASR accents at 262 ms · weakest: LibriSpeech at 303 ms.

Limits of this comparison

Because the model name is generic, these results refer specifically to the endpoint served by Reson8.

  • These results do not apply to similarly named real-time transcription endpoints from other providers.

Official sources

Results are re-measured daily using fixed datasets and reported over a rolling 30-day window. Same datasets, prompts and metric definitions for every model, measured by Coval’s open-source runner. Full methodology on the overview.

Evaluate your own voice agent

Use Coval to test your production configuration, prompts and calls—not only the public benchmark endpoints.

Book a Demo