SPEECHMATICSSPEECH-TO-TEXT136,840 SAMPLES / 30 DAYSLAST RUN NOV 2, 2026, 09:00 UTC

Linden 1 speech-to-text benchmarks

Linden 1, hosted by Speechmatics, measures mean 254 ms time to final segment (20th of 28) and 3.8% word error rate (10th of 30) among STT systems. Results cover the last 30 days. Coval benchmarks hosted endpoints daily using a consistent evaluation methodology. Last measured .

Coval has active speech-to-text measurements for Linden 1, created by Speechmatics and served through Speechmatics's own API.

Word Error Rate#10 / 30
3.8%
Time to First Token#14 / 28
1528ms

Overview

Linden 1 is tested every day on fixed public audio — clean, accented, noisy, reverberant, far-field, clipped and phone-codec speech — for transcription accuracy and streaming latency.

Technical specifications

Hosted by
Speechmatics
Source
Official API
Licensing
Proprietary
Deployment
Cloud
Region
Europe
Features
Diarization, Multilingual, VAD

How Linden 1 ranks

Full STT dashboard
Time to Final Segment — every measured STT modelMilliseconds · lower is better · 30-day averageEvery STT model ranked on Time to Final Segment, with Linden 1 highlighted.
  1. #1Qwen3 ASR 1.7b35 ms
  2. #2STT RT v544 ms
  3. #4STT 170 ms
  4. #5Nova 385 ms
  5. #6Nova 287 ms
  6. #9Flux101 ms
  7. #12Whisper Large v3via Baseten126 ms
  8. #14Ink 2146 ms
  9. #16Whisper Large v3via Together AI174 ms
  10. #17Grok STT180 ms
  11. #18Pulse203 ms
  12. #19resonant-1243 ms
  13. #20Linden 1254 ms
Show all 28 models
  1. #21Default261 ms
  2. #23Daytona STT384 ms
  3. #24Solaria 1414 ms
  4. #27Chirp 3807 ms
  5. #28Chirp 2895 ms
median of all models · 152 ms
STT models over the last 30 days, ranked on Time to Final Segment.
#ModelHostTTFSWERTTFTSamples
1Qwen3 ASR 1.7bBaseten35 ms936 ms13,678
2STT RT v5Soniox44 ms1525 ms27,365
3Qwen3 ASR FastNari Labs50 ms1755 ms27,371
4STT 1Inworld AI70 ms1026 ms27,334
5Nova 3Deepgram85 ms1444 ms27,364
6Nova 2Deepgram87 ms1427 ms27,311
7Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3Together AI88 ms1197 ms15,445
8Flux MultilingualDeepgram100 ms1174 ms27,365
9FluxDeepgram101 ms1097 ms27,371
10Universal 3.6 ProAssemblyAI114 ms1079 ms27,335
11Scribe v2 RealtimeElevenLabs118 ms2151 ms27,366
12Whisper Large v3Baseten126 ms914 ms13,674
13Universal 3.5 ProAssemblyAI126 ms1019 ms27,373
14Ink 2Cartesia146 ms2034 ms27,369
15Realtime GlobalReson8159 ms2060 ms22,469
16Whisper Large v3Together AI174 ms1210 ms15,513
17Grok STTSpaceXAI180 ms—27,332
18PulseSmallest203 ms1988 ms27,366
19resonant-1Reson8243 ms—27,372
20Linden 1Speechmatics254 ms1528 ms27,368
21DefaultGradium261 ms2005 ms27,364
22Gemini 3.5 Transcribe LiveGemini383 ms1542 ms27,270
23Daytona STTGuava384 ms5651 ms13,133
24Solaria 1Gladia414 ms1608 ms27,306
25Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime 2602Mistral436 ms1867 ms20,731
26GPT Realtime WhisperOpenAI563 ms1822 ms26,862
27Chirp 3Google807 ms6007 ms27,330
28Chirp 2Google895 ms6097 ms27,368
—Nemotron 3.5 ASR StreamingTogether AI—1557 ms15,422
—Universal StreamingAssemblyAI—1516 ms27,339
Under-sampled models are excluded; tied models share a place. Dotted WER values split into substitutions, deletions and insertions on hover or tap.

Highest relative placement: 10th of 30 on Word Error Rate.

Latency vs accuracy

Where the errors come from

WER compositionLinden 1's Word Error Rate split by error type · 30-day averageLinden 1's WER split into substitutions, deletions and insertions.
  • Linden 13.8%
SubstitutionsDeletionsInsertions

Averages and tail latency

Averages hide slow outliers — these are the distributions behind each figure.

Linden 1 latency distributionMilliseconds · shared axis across metrics · last 30 daysLinden 1's latency percentiles per metric: p25–p75 band, p50 tick, whisker to max.
  • Time to Final Segmentp50 229 ms · Max 21466 ms
  • Time to First Tokenp50 1537 ms · Max 15599 ms
band p25–p75 · tick p50 · whisker to max with p90 and p95 stops
Average and percentile values per metric, with the number of samples behind each row.
MetricAveragep25p50p75p90p95MaxSamples
Time to Final Segment254 ms218 ms229 ms259 ms346 ms368 ms21466 ms27,368
Word Error Rate3.8%0.0%0.0%6.7%12.5%18.2%100.0%27,368
Time to First Token1528 ms1144 ms1537 ms1681 ms2085 ms2386 ms15599 ms27,368

Last 30 days

Daily medians from the same measurement runs · gaps are days without qualifying runs.

Time to Final Segment — daily p50Line p50 · band p25–p75 · UTC daysLinden 1's daily median Time to Final Segment over the last 30 days.
Linden 1 · Oct 3: 360 msLinden 1 · Oct 4: 365 msLinden 1 · Oct 5: 362 msLinden 1 · Oct 6: 356 msLinden 1 · Oct 7: 231 msLinden 1 · Oct 8: 226 msLinden 1 · Oct 9: 241 msLinden 1 · Oct 10: 237 msLinden 1 · Oct 11: 227 msLinden 1 · Oct 12: 223 msLinden 1 · Oct 13: 236 msLinden 1 · Oct 14: 231 msLinden 1 · Oct 15: 241 msLinden 1 · Oct 16: 221 msLinden 1 · Oct 17: 236 msLinden 1 · Oct 18: 222 msLinden 1 · Oct 19: 215 msLinden 1 · Oct 20: 226 msLinden 1 · Oct 21: 226 msLinden 1 · Oct 22: 227 msLinden 1 · Oct 23: 240 msLinden 1 · Oct 24: 224 msLinden 1 · Oct 25: 222 msLinden 1 · Oct 26: 221 msLinden 1 · Oct 27: 231 msLinden 1 · Oct 28: 220 msLinden 1 · Oct 29: 234 msLinden 1 · Oct 30: 229 msLinden 1 · Oct 31: 217 msLinden 1 · Nov 1: 228 msLinden 1 · Nov 2: 226 ms
Word Error Rate — daily averageDaily average · UTC daysLinden 1's daily Word Error Rate over the last 30 days.
Linden 1 · Oct 3: 4.7%Linden 1 · Oct 4: 4.7%Linden 1 · Oct 5: 4.7%Linden 1 · Oct 6: 5.0%Linden 1 · Oct 7: 6.0%Linden 1 · Oct 8: 5.3%Linden 1 · Oct 9: 4.5%Linden 1 · Oct 10: 5.2%Linden 1 · Oct 11: 5.1%Linden 1 · Oct 12: 4.8%Linden 1 · Oct 13: 5.2%Linden 1 · Oct 14: 4.7%Linden 1 · Oct 15: 4.9%Linden 1 · Oct 16: 5.5%Linden 1 · Oct 17: 4.9%Linden 1 · Oct 18: 4.6%Linden 1 · Oct 19: 4.5%Linden 1 · Oct 20: 5.4%Linden 1 · Oct 21: 5.7%Linden 1 · Oct 22: 4.8%Linden 1 · Oct 23: 3.8%Linden 1 · Oct 24: 5.9%Linden 1 · Oct 25: 5.4%Linden 1 · Oct 26: 4.5%Linden 1 · Oct 27: 5.4%Linden 1 · Oct 28: 5.7%Linden 1 · Oct 29: 5.9%Linden 1 · Oct 30: 5.2%Linden 1 · Oct 31: 3.8%Linden 1 · Nov 1: 5.1%Linden 1 · Nov 2: 3.9%

Time to Final Segment by dataset

Linden 1 by test conditionMilliseconds · lower is better · best condition firstLinden 1's Time to Final Segment on each benchmark dataset.
Time to Final Segment per dataset, with the number of samples behind each figure.
DatasetTTFSSamples
ProductionPipeCat244 ms14,409
AccentsWildASR293 ms1,441
CleanWildASR247 ms5,760
ClippingWildASR273 ms1,441
Far-fieldWildASR302 ms1,440
Noise gapsWildASR268 ms1,439
Phone codecWildASR268 ms1,438

Strongest condition: PipeCat (production) at 244 ms · weakest: WildASR far-field at 302 ms.

How fast is Linden 1?

On Speechmatics, Linden 1 measures mean 254 ms time to final segment (20th of 28) and mean 1528 ms time to first token (14th of 28). Last measured 2026-11-02.

How accurate is Linden 1?

On Speechmatics, Linden 1 measures 3.8% word error rate (10th of 30). Last measured 2026-11-02.

Who hosts Linden 1?

Linden 1 is created by Speechmatics and served by Speechmatics. Coval measures each hosted endpoint separately.

Results are re-measured daily using fixed datasets and reported over a rolling 30-day window. Same datasets, prompts and metric definitions for every model, measured by Coval’s open-source runner. Full methodology on the overview.

Evaluate your own voice agent

Use Coval to test your production configuration, prompts and calls—not only the public benchmark endpoints.

Book a Demo